FYI                             

Missouri Ethics Commission

Frequently Asked Questions

Created: August 19, 2009 

Conflict of Interest

Financial Gain/Influencing Decisions

1. Question: Can public officials or employees act or vote on decisions which may financially impact themselves or their family? (Section 105.452(4), 105.452(5), and 105.454, RSMo.)

Answer: The statutes provide specific instances that a public official or employee cannot take part in, including:

 

        Decisions that may financially impact themselves or their family when the vote would provide them, their spouse, or dependent child a special monetary benefit which is not provided to a larger class. The term special monetary benefit is defined in the statute as” being materially affected in a substantially different manner or degree than the public in general or members of a special class will be affected.” (Section 105.452(4), RSMo)

An official or employee may not use decision-making authority for the purpose of obtaining a financial gain which materially enriches themselves or their spouse or dependent children for the purpose of coercing or extorting from another anything of actual monetary value. (Section 105.452(5), RSMo)  For More Information Visit:

http://www.mec.mo.gov/

**************************************************************
Think You Know What the Sunshine Law Means?


********************************************************************

Check the Column to the Left and


Take the

Sunshine Law Test   

Missouri’s commitment to openness in government is clearly stated in Section 610.011 of
the Sunshine Law: “It is the public policy of this state that meetings, records, votes, actions, and deliberations of public governmental bodies be open to the public unless otherwise provided by law. Sections 610.010 to 610.200 shall be liberally construed and their exceptions strictly construed to promote this public policy.”

  The law sets out the specific instances when a meeting, record or vote may be closed, while stressing these exceptions are to be strictly interpreted to promote the public policy of openness.

  Public meetings, including meetings conducted by telephone, Internet or other electronic means, are to be held at reasonably convenient times and must be accessible to the public. Meetings should be held in facilities that are large enough to accommodate anticipated attendance by the public and accessible to persons with disabilities.
    ***********************************************************

Hear Atty. Jeff Duke
explain what he did and why.


Download an audio file of the

March 16, 2010  Board of Trustees Meeting

________________________________________________



© 2000 - 2010 powered by
www.doteasy.com